Thursday, 3 October 2013

How a child develops the use of grammar. 
 
15 months:
Holophrastic stage
  • Bye Mummy
  • Isee
  • Allgone
20 months:
Telegraphic stage 
  • All fall down
  • Teddy tired
  • Gone, where Mummy gone?
  • More juice
28 months:
  • Teddy's hat came off
  • Harry's got a big, big green truck
36 months:
Post - telegraphic stage
  • Little Luke hit me, he did
  • I am going to see Harriet another day tomorrow
  • I don't like faces, I want to see children's ITV
40 months:
  • Look at my knee. I felled over in the playground
  • Once upon a time there was a little girl and she got beautiful hair and then the monster killed her and then she got dead and then and then the beautiful fairy came and made them better again
The problems children face in their lexical and phonological development.
   
 During the early years development of a child's language, they have difficulty with the lexical framework. For example, having a limited vocabulary, not using synonyms for other words, that have the same meanings. Also, antonyms which are words that have opposite meanings. It derives from the Greek words "anti" for opposite and "onym" for name. Young children, in the early stages of learning the English language, do not associate words with other words. For example, they do not group words together like 'salt' and 'pepper' or 'black' and 'white'. These word groups are called 'collocations'. They also have difficulty with choosing to use words that convey a particular register (informal or formal). This is because they have difficulty sculpting their vocabulary in order to be cohesive with the setting or audience etc. 

As a child's vocabulary advances and expands, they have to learn how to distinguish different sounds and to segment the speech stream they hear, into phonemes. The phonemes /units of words, when written are made clear by leaving spaces between each word. However, in spoken language, words are spoken in a successive stream without clear pauses. Making it therefore difficult for a child to differentiate between words and to know when one word ends and another begins, e.g. 'a cup of coffee' when spoken, is 'acupofcoffee', if not familiar with the English language, it is difficult to know if 'a cup' are two individual word units or if 'cupofc', is a single unit.
Jean Berko's 'Wug' experiemnt.
During the experiment Berko was trying to show the contrast in an adult's responses to the relevant tense questions, compared to a young child's answers. The adult knew to convert the word 'wug' to 'wugette; because 'ette' is an established English word ending for an animal that is a smaller version of the fully grown animal. Therefore, the interviewee knew to make this modification to the word, even though 'wug' is an imaginary word. A child however, would not know to modify the word by adding letters to the end, for example 'ette', 'ling' or 'y'; instead labelled the image as a 'baby wug'. 

Thursday, 4 July 2013

Transcript analysis.


Language and Power – ‘The Apprentice’ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW9ENhFoWBE

  • What is interesting about the language used?

Alan uses metaphors and exaggerated language regularly, ‘if I asked you to dig me a trench you’d dig me a trench’. However, the other participants in the conversation were noticeably less powerful and therefore did not use recognised language features  like metaphors etc, this is because they had less control and less time to say what they were trying to say, because usually all their speech is in reply to Sugar’s questions – one word replies, ‘no’ and  ‘I didn’t’.

  • What theory could you use when analysing the transcript?

Goffman’s theory of ‘face’ during conversational interactions, which is expanded upon by Brown and Levinson is displayed in the transcript. Brown and Levinson identified face – saving and face – threatening acts that arise during conversations, for example if a person is being rude, it is threatening their ‘face’. An example of this in the transcript is when Lord Sugar dismisses one of the hopeful contestants from the board room,
‘I’m getting sick of looking at you at the moment get out that door’ and ‘get back to the the bloody house’.

  • What other data could you collect that would compare with it?
  • What could you title an investigation into data like this?

-Language and power in the board room.

  • What real data could you collect?

Sound recordings and interviews of the eliminated contestant immediately after his departure.